Rev 2; Jan 16, 09 Network-based Mobility Extensions (NetExt) BOF proposal: ------------------------------------------------------- Background and Motivation: ------------------------- Proxy MIP6, which is the IETF Network-based Mobility Protocol specified in RFC 5213, has been incorporated into the evolved architecture of Long-Term Evolution (LTE) and Wimax networks. The respective standards organizations are in the process of specifying the Proxy MIP6 protocol for their current requirements and outlining the enhancements for subsequent releases of these networks. In light of the above, the following observations can be made: o as the trials and deployments of 4G networks are expected to begin in 2009, their evolution to support features such multihoming, inter-access technology handovers and localized routing continues o while the base PMIPv6 protocol is completed, improvements are necessary in some areas, most notably multihoming and inter-access technology handovers o certain deployment considerations, including localized routing and bulk refresh of lifetime are already emerging In summary, improvements, deficiencies and deployment considerations are identified to extend the network-based mobility (i.e., PMIPv6) to better meet the evolution of 4G mobile networks. Prior activity: -------------- The NetExt Bar BoF was held during the Dublin IETF meeting on Thursday, July 31 from 1300 - 1500. Subsequently another followup meeting of interested contributors was held at IETF73 in Minneapolis. The primary purpose of the BOF was to investigate problems of relevance to the Network-based mobility protocol (i.e., PMIPv6) and its adoption in the industry. Three main categories of problems - Improvements, Deployment Considerations and Deficiencies were discussed. There were a total of 12 presentations, and a summary presentation/discussion was held in the final half hour. There was consensus that the current charter and roadmap of the NETLMM Working Group makes it imperative to pursue the above-mentioned categories of problems in a separate, complementary WG. There was overwhelming support among the approximately 40 people who attended the Bar BoF in working on the proposed items. Over 25 people who are interested in contributing to the work attended the Netext special-interest-group meeting in Minneapolis. Work on defining the problem statements for the proposed work items is now in progress. There were no objections to creating a potential WG in the Internet Area. Proposed Work: ------------- The proposed NetExt Working Group will focus on the following topics relevant for network-based mobility: Improvements: o Multihoming: a specification including the target scenarios, preservation of IP sessions and load balancing (Proposed Standard) o Inter-access Technology handovers: a specification for IP session preservation when changing access technologies (PS) Deployment Considerations: o Localized Routing: a specification for constraining routing to the MAG(s) without involving the LMA within a single PMIPv6 domain (PS) o Bulk Refresh: specification of improving the signaling load for binding lifetime refresh (PS) Deficiencies: o MN involvement: documentation of scenarios where MN involvement may be seen as beneficial (Informational) The BoF proposes to discuss the above items and gauge interest in forming a working Group. There is already work in progress addressing the identified problems, which is expected to be the starting point for the deliverables. The proposed activity will be complementary to the existing IETF Working Groups, notably the NETLMM and MEXT WGs. Approximate Timeline for Deliverables: ------------------------------------- March 2009 WG approved by IESG 2Q09 Problem statements for multihoming, localized routing and inter-access HO agreed upon in the WG 2H09 Submit Inter-access Tech Handover, Localized Routing and Multihoming I-Ds to IESG 4Q09 Submit the I-D on MN Involvement to IESG 1Q10 Submit Bulk Refresh I-D to IESG 2H10 Recharter or close WG