draft-arkko-eap-aka-pfs-04.txt   draft-arkko-eap-aka-pfs.txt 
Network Working Group J. Arkko Network Working Group J. Arkko
Internet-Draft K. Norrman Internet-Draft K. Norrman
Intended status: Informational V. Torvinen Updates: RFC5448 (if approved) V. Torvinen
Expires: July 25, 2019 Ericsson Intended status: Informational Ericsson
January 21, 2019 Expires: May 21, 2020 November 18, 2019
Perfect-Forward Secrecy for the Extensible Authentication Protocol Perfect-Forward Secrecy for the Extensible Authentication Protocol
Method for Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP-AKA' PFS) Method for Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP-AKA' PFS)
draft-arkko-eap-aka-pfs-04 draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-02
Abstract Abstract
Many different attacks have been reported as part of revelations Many different attacks have been reported as part of revelations
associated with pervasive surveillance. Some of the reported attacks associated with pervasive surveillance. Some of the reported attacks
involved compromising smart cards, such as attacking SIM card involved compromising smart cards, such as attacking SIM card
manufacturers and operators in an effort to compromise shared secrets manufacturers and operators in an effort to compromise shared secrets
stored on these cards. Since the publication of those reports, stored on these cards. Since the publication of those reports,
manufacturing and provisioning processes have gained much scrutiny manufacturing and provisioning processes have gained much scrutiny
and have improved. However, the danger of resourceful attackers for and have improved. However, the danger of resourceful attackers for
these systems is still a concern. these systems is still a concern.
This specification is an optional extension to the EAP-AKA' This specification is an optional extension to the EAP-AKA'
authentication method which was defined in RFC 5448 (to be superseded authentication method which was defined in [I-D.ietf-emu-rfc5448bis].
by draft-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis). The extension, when negotiated, The extension, when negotiated, provides Perfect Forward Secrecy for
provides Perfect Forward Secrecy for the session key generated as a the session key generated as a part of the authentication run in EAP-
part of the authentication run in EAP-AKA'. This prevents an AKA'. This prevents an attacker who has gained access to the long-
attacker who has gained access to the long-term pre-shared secret in term pre-shared secret in a SIM card from being able to decrypt any
a SIM card from being able to decrypt all past communications. In past communications. In addition, if the attacker stays merely a
addition, if the attacker stays merely a passive eavesdropper, the passive eavesdropper, the extension prevents attacks against future
extension prevents attacks against future sessions. This forces sessions. This forces attackers to use active attacks instead.
attackers to use active attacks instead.
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on July 25, 2019.
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 21, 2020.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 3, line 42 skipping to change at page 3, line 40
The authors want to provide a public specification of an extension The authors want to provide a public specification of an extension
that helps defend against one aspect of pervasive surveillance. This that helps defend against one aspect of pervasive surveillance. This
is important, given the large number of users such practices may is important, given the large number of users such practices may
affect. It is also a stated goal of the IETF to ensure that we affect. It is also a stated goal of the IETF to ensure that we
understand the surveillance concerns related to IETF protocols and understand the surveillance concerns related to IETF protocols and
take appropriate countermeasures [RFC7258]. This document does that take appropriate countermeasures [RFC7258]. This document does that
for EAP-AKA'. for EAP-AKA'.
This specification is an optional extension to the EAP-AKA' This specification is an optional extension to the EAP-AKA'
authentication method [RFC5448] (to be superseded by authentication method [I-D.ietf-emu-rfc5448bis]. While optional, the
[I-D.ietf-emu-rfc5448bis]). The extension, when negotiated, provides use of this extension is RECOMMENDED.
Perfect Forward Secrecy for the session key generated as a part of
the authentication run in EAP-AKA'. This prevents an attacker who The extension, when negotiated, provides Perfect Forward Secrecy for
has gained access to the long-term pre-shared secret in a SIM card the session key generated as a part of the authentication run in EAP-
from being able to decrypt all past communications. In addition, if AKA'. This prevents an attacker who has gained access to the long-
the attacker stays merely a passive eavesdropper, the extension term pre-shared secret in a SIM card from being able to decrypt any
prevents attacks against future sessions. This forces attackers to past communications. In addition, if the attacker stays merely a
use active attacks instead. As with other protocols, an active passive eavesdropper, the extension prevents attacks against future
attacker with access to the long-term key material will of course be sessions. This forces attackers to use active attacks instead. As
able to attack all future communications, but risks detection, with other protocols, an active attacker with access to the long-term
particularly if done at scale. key material will of course be able to attack all future
communications, but risks detection, particularly if done at scale.
Attacks against AKA authentication via compromising the long-term Attacks against AKA authentication via compromising the long-term
secrets in the SIM cards have been an active discussion topic in many secrets in the SIM cards have been an active discussion topic in many
contexts. Perfect forward secrecy is on the list of features for the contexts. Perfect forward secrecy is on the list of features for the
next release of 3GPP (5G Phase 2), and this document provides a basis next release of 3GPP (5G Phase 2), and this document provides a basis
for providing this feature in a particular fashion. for providing this feature in a particular fashion.
It should also be noted that 5G network architecture includes the use It should also be noted that 5G network architecture includes the use
of the EAP framework for authentication. While any methods can be of the EAP framework for authentication. While any methods can be
run, the default authentication method within that context will be run, the default authentication method within that context will be
skipping to change at page 5, line 30 skipping to change at page 5, line 30
practical systems perfect forward secrecy can be enabled for practical systems perfect forward secrecy can be enabled for
either all or significant fraction of users. either all or significant fraction of users.
3. Background 3. Background
3.1. AKA 3.1. AKA
AKA is based on challenge-response mechanisms and symmetric AKA is based on challenge-response mechanisms and symmetric
cryptography. AKA typically runs in a UMTS Subscriber Identity cryptography. AKA typically runs in a UMTS Subscriber Identity
Module (USIM) or a CDMA2000 (Removable) User Identity Module Module (USIM) or a CDMA2000 (Removable) User Identity Module
((R)UIM). In contrast with its earlier GSM counterparts, 3rd ((R)UIM). In contrast with its earlier GSM counterparts, AKA
generation AKA provides long key lengths and mutual authentication. provides long key lengths and mutual authentication.
AKA works in the following manner: AKA works in the following manner:
o The identity module and the home environment have agreed on a o The identity module and the home environment have agreed on a
secret key beforehand. secret key beforehand.
o The actual authentication process starts by having the home o The actual authentication process starts by having the home
environment produce an authentication vector, based on the secret environment produce an authentication vector, based on the secret
key and a sequence number. The authentication vector contains a key and a sequence number. The authentication vector contains a
random part RAND, an authenticator part AUTN used for random part RAND, an authenticator part AUTN used for
skipping to change at page 8, line 19 skipping to change at page 8, line 19
The general security properties and potential vulnerabilities of AKA The general security properties and potential vulnerabilities of AKA
and EAP-AKA' are discussed in [I-D.ietf-emu-rfc5448bis]. and EAP-AKA' are discussed in [I-D.ietf-emu-rfc5448bis].
An important vulnerability in that discussion relates to the recent An important vulnerability in that discussion relates to the recent
reports of compromised long term pre-shared keys used in AKA reports of compromised long term pre-shared keys used in AKA
[Heist2015]. These attacks are not specific to AKA or EAP-AKA', as [Heist2015]. These attacks are not specific to AKA or EAP-AKA', as
all security systems fail at least to some extent if key material is all security systems fail at least to some extent if key material is
stolen. However, the reports indicate a need to look into solutions stolen. However, the reports indicate a need to look into solutions
that can operate at least to an extent under these types of attacks. that can operate at least to an extent under these types of attacks.
It is noted in [Heist2015] that some security can be retained even in It is noted in [Heist2015] that some security can be retained even in
the face of the attacks by providing Perfect Forward Security (PFS) the face of the attacks by providing Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS)
[DOW1992] for the session key. If AKA would have provided PFS, [DOW1992] for the session key. If AKA would have provided PFS,
compromising the pre-shared key would not be sufficient to perform compromising the pre-shared key would not be sufficient to perform
passive attacks; the attacker is, in addition, forced to be a Man-In- passive attacks; the attacker is, in addition, forced to be a Man-In-
The-Middle (MITM) during the AKA run and subsequent communication The-Middle (MITM) during the AKA run and subsequent communication
between the parties. between the parties.
4. Requirements Language 4. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
skipping to change at page 23, line 31 skipping to change at page 23, line 31
RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017, RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[I-D.ietf-emu-rfc5448bis] [I-D.ietf-emu-rfc5448bis]
Arkko, J., Lehtovirta, V., Torvinen, V., and P. Eronen, Arkko, J., Lehtovirta, V., Torvinen, V., and P. Eronen,
"Improved Extensible Authentication Protocol Method for "Improved Extensible Authentication Protocol Method for
3rd Generation Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP- 3GPP Mobile Network Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP-
AKA')", draft-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-04 (work in progress), AKA')", draft-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-05 (work in progress),
January 2019. July 2019.
9.2. Informative References 9.2. Informative References
[RFC4186] Haverinen, H., Ed. and J. Salowey, Ed., "Extensible [RFC4186] Haverinen, H., Ed. and J. Salowey, Ed., "Extensible
Authentication Protocol Method for Global System for Authentication Protocol Method for Global System for
Mobile Communications (GSM) Subscriber Identity Modules Mobile Communications (GSM) Subscriber Identity Modules
(EAP-SIM)", RFC 4186, DOI 10.17487/RFC4186, January 2006, (EAP-SIM)", RFC 4186, DOI 10.17487/RFC4186, January 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4186>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4186>.
[RFC5216] Simon, D., Aboba, B., and R. Hurst, "The EAP-TLS [RFC5216] Simon, D., Aboba, B., and R. Hurst, "The EAP-TLS
skipping to change at page 24, line 37 skipping to change at page 24, line 37
2015, in https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/02/19/ 2015, in https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/02/19/
great-sim-heist/ . great-sim-heist/ .
[DOW1992] Diffie, W., vanOorschot, P., and M. Wiener, [DOW1992] Diffie, W., vanOorschot, P., and M. Wiener,
"Authentication and Authenticated Key Exchanges", June "Authentication and Authenticated Key Exchanges", June
1992, in Designs, Codes and Cryptography 2 (2): pp. 1992, in Designs, Codes and Cryptography 2 (2): pp.
107-125. 107-125.
Appendix A. Change Log Appendix A. Change Log
The -02 version of the WG draft took into account additional reviews,
and changed the document to update RFC 5448 (or rather, its
successor, [I-D.ietf-emu-rfc5448bis]), and changed the wording of the
recommendation with regards to the use of this extension. Some
editorial changes were also made.
The -00 and -01 versions of the WG draft made no major changes, only
updates to some references.
The -05 version is merely a refresh while the draft was waiting for
WG adoption.
The -04 version of this draft made only editorial changes. The -04 version of this draft made only editorial changes.
The -03 version of this draft changed the naming of various protocol The -03 version of this draft changed the naming of various protocol
components, values, and notation to match with the use of ECDH in components, values, and notation to match with the use of ECDH in
ephemeral mode. The AT_KDF_PFS negotiation process was clarified in ephemeral mode. The AT_KDF_PFS negotiation process was clarified in
that exactly one key is ever sent in AT_KDF_ECDHE. The option of that exactly one key is ever sent in AT_KDF_ECDHE. The option of
checking for zero key values IN ECDHE was added. The format of the checking for zero key values IN ECDHE was added. The format of the
actual key in AT_PUB_ECDHE was specified. Denial-of-service actual key in AT_PUB_ECDHE was specified. Denial-of-service
considerations for the PFS process have been updated. Bidding down considerations for the PFS process have been updated. Bidding down
attacks against this extension itself are discussed extensively. attacks against this extension itself are discussed extensively.
 End of changes. 9 change blocks. 
32 lines changed or deleted 45 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.42. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/